CSM_RH Paper 21
Dyadic Lag-Energy Decorrelation and a Prime-Side Linear Contraction-Mass Candidate
Project: CSM_RH
Paper: 21
Version: v0.1
Date: 2026-09-06
Parent: CSM_RH v1.11 / Paper 20
Campaign: 20 — PRIME_SIDE_FIXED_POWER_LEMMA_GENERATION
0. Trust boundary
RH_PROVED = FALSE
RH_DISPROVED = FALSE
GLOBAL_RH_CERTIFICATE = FALSE
CSM_RH_ROOT_STATUS = OPEN
This paper introduces a prime-side fixed-power generator whose hypothesis contains no factor X−δ.
1. Short-interval error
Let
an=Λ(n)−1
for 1≤n≤X, extended by zero outside this range. Define
UH(x)=r=1∑Hax+r,
and
SX(H)=x∈Z∑∣UH(x)∣2.
2. Exact two-scale identity
Since
U2H(x)=UH(x)+UH(x+H),
define
CX(H)=ℜx∑UH(x)UH(x+H).
Then
SX(2H)=2SX(H)+2CX(H).
Cauchy gives
−SX(H)≤CX(H)≤SX(H),
hence
SX(2H)≤4SX(H).
3. Normalized energy
Set
RX(H)=XH2SX(H).
Then
RX(H)RX(2H)=21(1+SX(H)CX(H))=4SX(H)SX(2H).
Thus the universal bound is RX(2H)≤RX(H).
4. One good scale
If for some fixed 0<ε≤1,
CX(H)≤(1−ε)SX(H),
then
RX(2H)≤(1−2ε)RX(H).
Equivalently,
SX(2H)≤(4−2ε)SX(H).
So any constant improvement over the trivial doubling constant 4 yields a fixed contraction of normalized lag energy.
5. Positive-density scales
Fix B>0 and 0<α<2/3. Let
H0=⌈(logX)B⌉,Hj=2jH0,
and let J be maximal with HJ≤Xα. Then
J=log2αlogX+O(loglogX).
Define PDSD (d,ε;α,B) by requiring that at least dJ+O(1) scales satisfy
CX(Hj)≤(1−ε)SX(Hj),
for fixed d,ε>0. All other scales may use only the trivial bound.
6. Initial scale
The trivial estimate
∣UH0(x)∣≪H0logX
gives
RX(H0)≪(logX)2.
7. Fixed power generated by iteration
Let
q=1−2ε<1.
Then
RX(HJ)≪(logX)2qdJ+O(1).
Therefore
RX(HJ)≪X−δsc+o(1),
where
δsc=αdlog2(1−ε/21)>0.
Equivalently,
SX(HJ)≪XHJ2X−δsc+o(1).
This is a genuine fixed power generated dynamically from Ω(logX) constant contractions.
8. Bridge to MLEPG and PESC
Set
δM=min{α,δsc}.
Then the preceding estimate is stronger than the MLEPG-compatible form
SX(HJ)≪XHJ(logX)O(1)+XHJ2X−δM+o(1).
Paper 17's residue-chain theorem gives a dyadic PNT mean-square bound
∫X2X∣ψ(x)−x∣2dx≪X3−κ+o(1)
for every sufficiently small
0<κ<min{α,δM,2−2α}.
Paper 20's Mellin pole recovery then implies
ζ(s)=0ℜs>1−2κ.
Thus PDSD has certified fixed-zero-strip authority without assuming a zero-side theorem.
9. Spectral form
Paper 18 gives
SX(H)=∫01∣SX(ξ)∣2∣DH(ξ)∣2dξ.
Since
D2H(ξ)=DH(ξ)[1+e(Hξ)],
we have
∣D2H(ξ)∣2=4cos2(πHξ)∣DH(ξ)∣2.
Hence
4SX(H)−SX(2H)=4∫01∣SX(ξ)∣2∣DH(ξ)∣2sin2(πHξ)dξ.
A good scale is therefore a fixed amount of spectral escape from the dyadic resonance set.
10. Why PDSD is not MLEPG renamed
MLEPG assumes an X−δ improvement at one mesoscopic scale.
PDSD assumes only a constant comparison between adjacent scales. No X−δ occurs in its hypothesis.
The exponent is produced by multiplication over logarithmically many scales.
This is the main reason PDSD survives Campaign 20.
11. Plausibility calibration
The Montgomery–Soundararajan short-interval variance prediction is
SX(H)≍XHlog(X/H).
It predicts
SX(H)SX(2H)∼2log(X/H)log(X/2H),
well below the universal barrier 4.
Recent conditional work on joint prime counts in multiple short intervals also finds weak negative correlations between disjoint intervals.
These are plausibility calibrations only, not proof inputs.
12. Current unconditional status
Current almost-all short-interval PNT results give strong subpower control of SX(H), but do not compare SX(2H) with SX(H) by a fixed factor on a positive density of scales.
Thus PDSD is open.
13. Campaign 20 audit
A1 principal-arc arithmetic power estimate
valid but same fixed-power bottleneck as MLEPG
A2 shrinking-threshold short-interval theorem
sufficient but unnecessarily strong
A3 direct MLEPG
remains open
A4 prime-side scale contraction
SURVIVOR -> PDSD
A5 direct PESC
root target
Create:
F-RH-017
POSITIVE_DENSITY_DYADIC_LAG_DECORRELATION
PDSD
status: OPEN
Create:
O-RH-046
DYADIC_SCALE_LOCKING_BARRIER
status: CERTIFIED
Create:
S-RH-028
ADJACENT_SHORT_INTERVAL_ERROR_DECORRELATION
status: OPEN
14. Campaign 21
CSM_RH Campaign 21
DYADIC_PRIME_ERROR_DECORRELATION_ATTACK
Tracks:
D1 average Hardy-Littlewood covariance
D2 spectral octave escape
D3 sieve variance lower bound
D4 positive-density scales
D5 contradiction from long critical locking
Reject any candidate that inserts a fixed X -power, assumes RH/fixed strip, uses conjectural variance as theorem, proves only one isolated good scale, or yields only O(loglogX) cumulative contraction mass.
15. Final status
RH = OPEN
PESC = OPEN
MLEPG = OPEN
PDSD = OPEN
FIXED POWER IN PDSD HYPOTHESIS = NONE
FIXED POWER GENERATED BY SCALE ITERATION = YES
CURRENT UNCONDITIONAL PDSD PROOF = NONE
NEXT CAMPAIGN = 21