CSM_RH Paper 09
Heath-Brown Unit-Sector Ledger and Fixed- Rough-Prime Persistence
Project: CSM_RH
Paper: 09
Version: v0.1
Date: 2026-09-05
Parent state: CSM_RH v0.9 / Paper 08
Campaign: 08 — CANONICAL_HEATH_BROWN_K3_ZERO_FREQUENCY_LEDGER
Status: exact combinatorial ledger / fixed- obstruction theorem; not a proof or disproof of RH
0. Trust boundary
This paper does not prove or disprove the Riemann Hypothesis.
Canonical root state:
RH_PROVED = FALSE
RH_DISPROVED = FALSE
GLOBAL_RH_CERTIFICATE = FALSE
CSM_RH_ROOT_STATUS = OPEN
The paper pins the Heath-Brown identity at , performs the alternating cancellation before any absolute values are taken, and groups the result by the number of non-unit truncated Möbius factors.
The main result is stronger than the initial audit:
the all-unit sector survives for every fixed , and on every -rough integer in the validity range it is exactly equal to .
Therefore increasing a fixed Heath-Brown depth cannot algebraically remove the rough prime / prime-power channel.
No live GLM-5.3-Flash run is claimed.
1. Pinned Heath-Brown identity
Let
Let
Let denote Dirichlet convolution.
Set
and
Define
For , the Heath-Brown identity is
throughout
The full-range validity follows directly from the standard proof: if
then every factor in
contains three integers strictly larger than , so their product is larger than
Hence this convolution vanishes on .
Expanding
and using
gives the identity.
2. Unit / non-unit Möbius split
Write
where
and
Substitute this into the pinned identity.
After expanding the alternating terms before taking any absolute values, one obtains
where collects exactly non-unit truncated Möbius factors.
3. Exact sectors
Sector — all Möbius factors are units
Sector — one non-unit Möbius factor
Equivalently,
Sector — two non-unit Möbius factors
Equivalently,
Sector — three non-unit Möbius factors
No unit configuration has been dropped.
4. Divisor-polynomial form of the all-unit sector
Let
be the ordered -fold divisor function.
By symmetry over the ordered factors,
Therefore for ,
This is an exact arithmetic function.
5. What the alternating unit algebra actually cancels
For a prime ,
Hence
For distinct primes ,
so
For a prime square,
and therefore
Thus the alternating unit sector does perform nontrivial algebraic cancellation:
prime
survives
prime square
survives with von Mangoldt weight
rough semiprime with distinct primes
cancels exactly
This is not elimination of the prime channel.
It is a finite combinatorial prime-power detector.
6. -rough numbers
Call -rough if it has no divisor
satisfying
Equivalently, every prime divisor of is larger than .
For such an , every convolution term containing vanishes.
Hence:
Theorem 6.1 — Rough-Prime Persistence
For every -rough integer
Proof
Because is supported on
any nonzero term from would force a divisor of in this range.
No such divisor exists.
Therefore
Since
the result follows.
7. Consequence at
Because
an -rough integer below cannot contain three prime factors counted with multiplicity.
Thus its possible von Mangoldt support is limited to:
large prime
large prime square
and the unit sector already assigns exactly the correct von Mangoldt weight.
The hoped-for cancellation of the Vaughan unit-divisor channel has therefore not occurred.
It has been reorganized into an exact rough-prime-power channel.
8. General fixed- all-unit sector
Now let
be fixed.
Take
The fixed- Heath-Brown identity is
on .
Write again
The all-unit sector is
Using the divisor-function identity,
9. Fixed- Rough-Prime Persistence Theorem
Theorem 9.1
For every fixed
every admissible , and every -rough integer
Proof
Exactly as in Theorem 6.1, every sector containing at least one non-unit truncated Möbius factor vanishes on a -rough integer.
Only remains.
The full Heath-Brown identity equals .
10. Prime persistence for every fixed
Let
be prime with
Then is -rough, so Theorem 9.1 gives
This can also be checked directly.
For a prime,
Therefore
Hence:
11. Zero-frequency CSSA sector ledger
Define
for
and retain the centering block
Then
The exact alternating cancellation internal to has already been performed in the .
No later block is allowed to claim that same cancellation a second time.
12. Generic exponent ledger
For fixed , every is bounded by a fixed divisor-function power times
Hence
for
Using only
one obtains
for every
The centering block is also
Thus the exponent ledger is:
| Sector | Meaning | Generic exponent | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| all-unit / rough-prime sector | CRITICAL | ||
| one non-unit Möbius factor | CRITICAL | ||
| two non-unit Möbius factors | CRITICAL | ||
| three non-unit Möbius factors | CRITICAL | ||
| centering | CRITICAL | ||
| full recombination | ORIGINAL FRONTIER |
No fixed-power saving is created by the identity alone.
13. Why the block is qualitatively different
The sectors contain actual truncated Möbius variables.
The sector does not.
On -rough numbers it is exactly .
Therefore any blockwise method which treats
separately must control a zero-frequency prime / prime-power channel with no Möbius averaging.
This is the Heath-Brown analogue of the Vaughan unit-divisor resonance.
But the structure is sharper:
the troublesome unit contribution has been algebraically cleaned into an exact rough von Mangoldt sector.
14. Cross-sector recombination
The exact identity
shows that complete signed recombination of the Heath-Brown sectors returns the original prime coefficient.
Adding the centering block returns
Thus:
blockwise absolute values
lose possible cross-sector cancellation
complete recombination
returns the original CSSA frontier
A successful fixed- Heath-Brown proof would require a nontrivial partial recombination theorem between these two extremes.
No such theorem is established here.
15. Fixed- frontier neutrality
Theorem 9.1 gives a general obstruction.
Theorem 15.1 — Fixed- Heath-Brown Rough-Channel Neutrality
For every fixed , the canonical all-unit sector retains the full von Mangoldt coefficient on the -rough subset of the validity range.
Therefore fixed- alternating convolution depth alone does not create a lower-strength zero-frequency prime frontier.
Any fixed-power gain must come from:
- a proved estimate on the all-unit rough sector;
- a theorem-forced cancellation between the all-unit sector and non-unit sectors;
- a recursive use of the identity across enough scales;
- or another new arithmetic mechanism.
Increasing while keeping it fixed does not eliminate this requirement.
16. New obstruction: fixed- rough-prime persistence
Create:
O-RH-017
FIXED_K_ROUGH_PRIME_PERSISTENCE
status:
CERTIFIED
Statement:
In every fixed- Heath-Brown identity with admissible truncation, the all-unit Möbius sector agrees exactly with on -rough integers. In particular every prime larger than survives with coefficient .
This obstruction generalizes the pinned result.
17. New obstruction: Heath-Brown fixed-depth frontier neutrality
Create:
O-RH-018
HEATH_BROWN_FIXED_DEPTH_FRONTIER_NEUTRALITY
status:
CERTIFIED_AT_IDENTITY_LEVEL
Statement:
For fixed , alternating convolution algebra can cancel composite factorization patterns, but it cannot remove the all-unit rough von Mangoldt sector. Complete recombination returns . The identity alone therefore supplies no fixed-power zero-frequency frontier contraction.
This is not an impossibility theorem for estimates built on the identity.
18. Campaign 08 verdict
The original Campaign 08 question was whether the alternating structure could eliminate the low-order unit channel before absolute values were taken.
The precise answer is:
UNIT CONFIGURATION CANCELLATION
YES, PARTIAL
ROUGH SEMIPRIME CANCELLATION
YES, EXACT
ROUGH PRIME / PRIME-POWER ELIMINATION
NO
ALL-UNIT SECTOR
SURVIVES
K=3 FIXED-POWER BLOCK SAVING
NONE
FIXED-K GENERALIZATION
ROUGH-PRIME PERSISTENCE CERTIFIED
Therefore increasing to with each fixed is not the next useful campaign.
19. New survivor: cross-sector rough-principal cancellation
Create:
S-RH-018
ROUGH_PRINCIPAL_CROSS_SECTOR_CANCELLATION
status:
OPEN
A valid theorem would need to prove that the critical all-unit sector cancels with a canonical signed combination of the non-unit sectors at fixed-power strength.
It must not simply recombine all sectors back into .
20. Why growing is the next structural question
Paper 07 proved that a fixed constant contraction repeated only
times cannot yield a fixed -power.
A fixed Heath-Brown depth has only finitely many alternating layers.
Therefore a new structural possibility is:
But growing changes three quantities simultaneously:
truncation scale
alternating binomial mass $$ \sum_{j=1}^{K}\binom Kj
2^K-1; $$
multilinear / dyadic block complexity.
A useful growing-depth route must gain enough contraction to beat these costs.
21. First depth-complexity calculation
If blockwise absolute values are taken across the -layers, the binomial coefficient mass is
If
then
So the combinatorial coefficient cost is exponent-neutral.
But such a is still sublogarithmic.
A constant contraction per layer would then yield only
by Paper 07.
If instead
then
The identity has acquired a fixed positive power of combinatorial mass before any analytic estimate.
Therefore a log-depth strategy cannot use blockwise absolute values on the alternating layers.
It must preserve substantial alternating cancellation.
22. Intermediate growth
For
one has
The truncation is
This gives increasing convolution depth with only polylogarithmic binomial mass.
But
so constant per-layer contraction alone remains subpower.
Thus the interesting growing- regime would require either:
per-layer gap increasing with K,
nonlocal cancellation across many j-layers,
or a contraction mechanism not proportional merely to depth.
23. Campaign 09
The next campaign is:
CSM_RH Campaign 09
GROWING_K_HEATH_BROWN_DEPTH_COMPLEXITY
It is not an RH proof campaign.
It is a feasibility audit for the last obvious way of extracting more structural depth from the Heath-Brown identity.
24. Campaign 09 required questions
Workers must answer:
Q1
For K=K(N), what exact truncation U(N) is used?
Q2
What is the exact alternating coefficient mass?
Q3
How many canonical dyadic / smooth blocks are created?
Q4
Which cancellations are preserved before absolute values?
Q5
What is the effective contraction per j-layer?
Q6
What is the cumulative contraction mass?
Q7
What is the combinatorial exponent tax?
Q8
Does net contraction remain linear in log N after subtracting all taxes?
Q9
Does the all-unit rough-prime sector remain critical?
Q10
If the answer is no fixed power, what is the strongest subpower profile actually obtained?
25. Campaign 09 hard rejection filters
Reject a candidate if:
R1. is ignored
Alternating coefficient mass must be included.
R2. Dyadic block count is ignored
Representation complexity is part of the exponent ledger.
R3. Constant contraction at is called fixed power
Paper 07 forbids this.
R4. is used with blockwise triangle inequality
The resulting factor is already a fixed power.
R5. The rough-prime sector is claimed to disappear
Theorem 9.1 still applies at each admissible .
R6. Growing- Möbius cancellation imports a fixed Mertens power
Paper 07's Möbius strength audit applies.
26. State transition
The canonical transition is:
CSM_RH v0.9
->
CSM_RH v1.0
The version number refers to closure-state maturity.
It does not indicate a proof of RH.
Transitions:
Campaign 08
CLOSED_AS_K3_AND_FIXED_K_UNIT_SECTOR_AUDIT
O-RH-017
FIXED_K_ROUGH_PRIME_PERSISTENCE
CREATED / CERTIFIED
O-RH-018
HEATH_BROWN_FIXED_DEPTH_FRONTIER_NEUTRALITY
CREATED / CERTIFIED AT IDENTITY LEVEL
S-RH-018
ROUGH_PRINCIPAL_CROSS_SECTOR_CANCELLATION
CREATED / OPEN
F-RH-008
GZMPS
REMAINS OPEN
Campaign 09
GROWING_K_HEATH_BROWN_DEPTH_COMPLEXITY
READY
27. Final status
RH = OPEN
CSSA FIXED POWER = OPEN
VAUGHAN FIXED IDENTITY = NEUTRAL
HEATH-BROWN K=3 = NEUTRAL AT IDENTITY LEVEL
ALL-UNIT ROUGH-PRIME CHANNEL = PERSISTS
EVERY FIXED K = SAME ROUGH-PRIME PERSISTENCE
FIXED-K DECOMPOSITION SEARCH = STRUCTURALLY EXHAUSTED
GROWING-K DEPTH / COMPLEXITY = OPEN
ROUGH-PRINCIPAL CROSS-SECTOR CANCELLATION = OPEN
The central theorem is:
Thus fixed higher convolution depth cleans composite factorization patterns but cannot algebraically remove the prime channel.
The next question is whether growing depth can create enough cumulative arithmetic contraction to offset its own combinatorial complexity.