# SOURCE MAP — Paper 06 v0.2

## Internal / prior EveMissLab lineage used
- Creator Descent, Withdrawal & Autonomous Worlds Series Paper 07
  - Precommitment–Local Self Problem
  - Current Subject Standing
  - Numerical Identity ≠ Complete Normative Authority
  - Conflict-Time Reauthorization
  - Reintegration Topology
  - Local Obligation Persistence
- PSED-07 — The Self Before the Seal and the Self Now
  - Cross-Time Consent Arbitration
  - No One-Signature-Forever
  - Standing-Responsive Consent
  - Current Will Non-Zero
  - ConsentToExperience ≠ ConsentToEveryIdentityOperation
  - Precommitment Humility
- Creator Descent Papers 06 and 08
  - Voluntary Self-Limitation
  - Self-Escrow
  - Dormant Power
  - Higher Origin Does Not Cancel Locality
  - Incarnation as Local Accountability
- Jesus Phenomenon Project JPP-14–19
- Reflexive Universalism Series Papers 01–05 v0.2

## Public comparison sources
- Council of Chalcedon (451)
- Third Council of Constantinople (680–681)
- Catechism of the Catholic Church §§470–475
- Mark 14:32–36
- Maximus the Confessor, Opusculum 6 and 7
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Philosophy and Christian Theology
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Free Will
- Mark C. Murphy on Christ's impeccability
- Timothy Pawl on Extended Conciliar Christology
- Ian McFarland on Maximus and the will

## Canonical internal constructs emphasized
1. Reflexive Freedom in Incarnation (RFI)
2. Double-Consent / Multi-Level Voluntariness Model (DCM)
3. Source Consent
4. Historical Enacted Consent
5. Distinct Will ≠ Distinct Person
6. Alignment ≠ Erasure
7. Incarnational Standing Principle
8. Recursive Agency Preservation
9. Origin Non-Override Principle
10. Human-Will Non-Zero Principle
11. Assent Non-Erasure Principle
12. Foreknowledge ≠ Will Substitution
13. Consent to Mission ≠ Authorization of Wrongdoing
14. Recursive Universalism
15. Free Alignment Hypothesis (open candidate)

## Method note
The paper strictly distinguishes:
- historical Jesus reconstruction,
- Gospel textual theology,
- conciliar Christology,
- modern philosophical reconstruction.

The DCM is not a claim that Christ is two persons.
It is a multi-level voluntariness model designed to preserve the reality of human willing
within a one-person / two-natures Christological framework or analogous higher-to-local models.