# SOURCE MAP — Paper 05 v0.2

## Internal / prior EveMissLab lineage used
- Creator Descent, Withdrawal & Autonomous Worlds Series Paper 05
  - Creator Descent
  - Experiential Non-Equivalence
  - KnowingX != BeingX
  - First-Person Instantiation
  - Creator Tourism Problem
  - Incarnational Sample Fallacy
  - Incarnation Without Domination
- Creator Descent Series Paper 06
  - Voluntary Self-Limitation
  - Capability / Knowledge / Memory / Exit-Awareness Seals
  - Self-Escrow
  - Privilege Salience
  - Dormant Creator Principle
- Creator Descent Series Paper 08
  - Anti-Solipsistic Incarnation
  - Real-Otherness Firewall
  - Local Responsibility Persistence
  - Incarnation as Local Accountability
- Jesus Phenomenon Project JPP-14 to JPP-18
  - Unique Eschatological Agent
  - Christological Lift
  - Cultic Inclusion
  - Cosmic Mediator
  - Function-Ontology Gap
  - Ontological Identifiability Wall
- Reflexive Universalism Papers 01-04 v0.2

## Public comparison sources
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Philosophy and Christian Theology, Incarnation and Christology
- Council of Chalcedon (451), Definition of Faith
- Vatican: Compendium of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, §§85-87
- Philippians 2:6-11
- Mark 10:45
- John 13:1-17
- Classical / analytic Christology and kenotic Christology literature

## Canonical internal constructs emphasized
1. Embodied Universalism Hypothesis (EUH)
2. Specialness != Exemption Privilege
3. Higher Authority -> burden against total cost externalization
4. Embodied Reflexivity Certificate
5. Embodied Semantics
6. Creator Tourism Problem
7. Visit != LiveUnderTheSameStakes
8. KnowingX != BeingX
9. Incarnation Without Domination
10. Incarnation as Local Accountability
11. Real-Otherness preservation
12. EUH strong / weak ontology-dependent forms

## Method note
The paper distinguishes:
- historical reconstruction of Jesus,
- Christian doctrinal claims about Incarnation,
- conditional philosophical interpretation.

It does not infer divine identity from moral exemplarity,
does not claim Christianity uniquely originates universalism,
and does not treat suffering as intrinsically good.