# Literature verification notes

Canonical bibliography support for Series I / Paper 04.

Verification date: 2026-08-14.

Primary or publisher-indexed sources checked where available.

1. Jacoby, Kelley, Brown & Jasechko (1989), Becoming Famous Overnight. JPSP 56(3):326-338. DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.326.
2. Johnson, Hashtroudi & Lindsay (1993), Source Monitoring. Psychological Bulletin 114(1):3-28. DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3.
3. Dywan & Jacoby (1990), Effects of Aging on Source Monitoring: Differences in Susceptibility to False Fame. Psychology and Aging 5(3):379-387. DOI 10.1037/0882-7974.5.3.379.
4. Montoya et al. (2017), A Re-examination of the Mere Exposure Effect. Psychological Bulletin 143(5):459-498. DOI 10.1037/bul0000085.
5. Foti & Luch (1992), The Influence of Individual Differences on the Perception and Categorization of Leaders. Leadership Quarterly 3(1):55-66. DOI 10.1016/1048-9843(92)90006-2.
6. Atir, Rosenzweig & Dunning (2024), Does Expertise Protect Against Overclaiming False Knowledge? OBHDP 184:104354. DOI 10.1016/j.obhdp.2024.104354.
7. Atir, Rosenzweig & Dunning (2015), When Knowledge Knows No Bounds. Psychological Science 26(8):1295-1303. DOI 10.1177/0956797615588195.
8. Du et al. (2024), Context versus Prior Knowledge in Language Models. ACL 2024. DOI 10.18653/v1/2024.acl-long.714.
9. Tan et al. (2017), Entity Linking for Queries by Searching Wikipedia Sentences. EMNLP 2017. DOI 10.18653/v1/D17-1007.
10. Vollmers et al. (2025), Contextual Augmentation for Entity Linking using Large Language Models. COLING 2025.
11. Hanczakowski et al. (2019), False Fame Effects Emerge Following an Internal Context Shift and Are Abolished With Contextual Reinstatement. Memory & Cognition.

Boundary notes:
- Observer-Dependent Perceived Prominence (ODPP), the observer rank-reversal theorem in PPSS, Search-Abundance Prominence Illusion, and the proposed ODPP Benchmark are theoretical constructs introduced in this paper.
- False-fame and source-monitoring literature supports the claim that fame judgments can be influenced by familiarity and source attribution, but does not directly validate the full online/search/AI model.
- Expertise literature supports observer heterogeneity and calibration differences, not a universal rule that experts always estimate fame better.