# Source Map — Paper 07

## External academic anchors

- Fong, Malhotra & Margalit (2019): public memories of past politicians are actively used in contemporary political debate and can alter the persuasiveness of arguments in policy domains associated with those politicians.
- Winger & Oliver (2024): former presidents can retain rhetorical and elite-cue influence after leaving formal office, showing post-office influence without governing authority.
- Cullinane & Ellis (2018): presidential legacy is constructed through achievements, failures, commemoration, media, monuments and later generations rather than being fixed at departure.
- Zubrzycki & Woźny (2020): collective memory contributes to national identity, political legitimation, reckoning with difficult pasts and transnational memory politics.
- Gugushvili, Kabachnik & Kirvalidze (2017): heroes and villains can be rehabilitated, vilified or contested; national identity shapes reputational politics.
- Cirone & Pepinsky (2022): historical effects can persist over decade-plus timescales and influence later political and social outcomes.
- Merton (1968): the Matthew effect provides a general model of cumulative recognition.

## Internal theory dependencies

1. Paper 01 — 權力升階轉譯
2. Paper 05 — 制度承接
3. Paper 06 — 真退場與聲望／實權分離
4. 《歷史沒有共同中心》
5. 《神聖與真理的人格化》
6. 《開國獨裁者的歷史來世》
7. 《歷史作為狀態變量》
8. 《表象主權與通道主權》

## New increment in Paper 07

Paper 07 introduces:
- historical-state vector $\mathbf{H}_{g,t}(x)$,
- centrality $C$ vs. evaluative valence $V$,
- contemporary usability $U$,
- durability $D$,
- post-office reference authority $A$,
- institutional embedding $E_x$,
- high-cost self-restraint signal $S_x^L$,
- open-memory test $OMT_x$,
- reputation-output gap $Gap_R$,
- cross-community memory distance $\Delta H$,
- negative historical authority,
- low-visible/high-embedded legacy.

Core endpoint:

$$
\text{實權}
\rightarrow
\text{制度}
\rightarrow
\text{真退場}
\rightarrow
\text{後職位權威}
\rightarrow
\text{歷史權威}.
$$