{
  "id": "rp-virtual-anchor-constitution",
  "schema_version": "0.2",
  "type": "ai_native_research_lineage",
  "title": "虛擬錨點與演化憲政",
  "title_en": "Virtual Anchors and Evolutionary Constitutionalism",
  "short_title": "虛擬錨點與演化憲政",
  "status": "completed",
  "open_ended": false,
  "started_at": "2026-07-24",
  "completed_at": "2026-07-26",
  "reference_method": "七篇依序展開：先建立主客體欲求場的虛擬錨點形式化（I），推出候選制度的虛擬憲法（II），再論證制度不應被永久崇拜、憲法應時間化（III/IV），最後給出三種可操作的憲政動態機制——制度張力比較、公開競爭式對抗辯證、可撤回的試行日落——第七篇明示為系列收束篇。",
  "canonical_route": "/ai/programs/virtual-anchor-constitution/",
  "visibility": "public",
  "languages": [
    "zh-Hant"
  ],
  "agency": {
    "initiative": "human",
    "primary_authorship": "human",
    "research_direction": "human_led",
    "continuation_control": "human"
  },
  "contributors": [
    {
      "name": "Neo.K",
      "type": "human",
      "roles": [
        "problem_proposer",
        "primary_author",
        "continuation_decider",
        "curator"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "foundation_artifacts": [],
  "applied_artifacts": [],
  "iterations": [
    {
      "sequence": 1,
      "id": "lm-001845",
      "title": "時間化憲法_未來主體制度演化與歷史合法性的非永久性_v0.1",
      "topic": "時間化憲法",
      "iteration_type": "foundation",
      "is_checkpoint": false,
      "canonical_url": "/p/lm-001845/",
      "raw_url": "/raw/lm-001845.md",
      "api_url": "/api/papers/lm-001845.json",
      "authorship": "collaborative",
      "month": "2026-07",
      "language": "zh-Hant"
    },
    {
      "sequence": 2,
      "id": "lm-001829",
      "title": "制度反崇拜論_制度主導利維坦化與自我正當化閉環_v0.1",
      "topic": "制度反崇拜論",
      "iteration_type": "graph_expansion",
      "is_checkpoint": false,
      "canonical_url": "/p/lm-001829/",
      "raw_url": "/raw/lm-001829.md",
      "api_url": "/api/papers/lm-001829.json",
      "authorship": "collaborative",
      "month": "2026-07",
      "language": "zh-Hant"
    },
    {
      "sequence": 3,
      "id": "lm-001879",
      "title": "虛擬錨點_主客體欲求場共同方向與非終極目標結構_v0.1",
      "topic": "虛擬錨點形式化",
      "iteration_type": "graph_expansion",
      "is_checkpoint": false,
      "canonical_url": "/p/lm-001879/",
      "raw_url": "/raw/lm-001879.md",
      "api_url": "/api/papers/lm-001879.json",
      "authorship": "collaborative",
      "month": "2026-07",
      "language": "zh-Hant"
    },
    {
      "sequence": 4,
      "id": "lm-001878",
      "title": "虛擬憲法_從方向性錨點到候選制度實現_v0.1",
      "topic": "虛擬憲法",
      "iteration_type": "graph_expansion",
      "is_checkpoint": false,
      "canonical_url": "/p/lm-001878/",
      "raw_url": "/raw/lm-001878.md",
      "api_url": "/api/papers/lm-001878.json",
      "authorship": "collaborative",
      "month": "2026-07",
      "language": "zh-Hant"
    },
    {
      "sequence": 5,
      "id": "lm-001830",
      "title": "制度張力論_現行憲法虛擬錨點與候補虛擬憲法的多重比較_v0.1",
      "topic": "制度張力論",
      "iteration_type": "graph_expansion",
      "is_checkpoint": false,
      "canonical_url": "/p/lm-001830/",
      "raw_url": "/raw/lm-001830.md",
      "api_url": "/api/papers/lm-001830.json",
      "authorship": "collaborative",
      "month": "2026-07",
      "language": "zh-Hant"
    },
    {
      "sequence": 6,
      "id": "lm-001876",
      "title": "競爭式虛擬憲政_制度原型的公開對抗辯證與投票授權_v0.1",
      "topic": "競爭式虛擬憲政",
      "iteration_type": "graph_expansion",
      "is_checkpoint": false,
      "canonical_url": "/p/lm-001876/",
      "raw_url": "/raw/lm-001876.md",
      "api_url": "/api/papers/lm-001876.json",
      "authorship": "collaborative",
      "month": "2026-07",
      "language": "zh-Hant"
    },
    {
      "sequence": 7,
      "id": "lm-001871",
      "title": "可撤回憲政_制度試行日落回復與持續再授權_v0.1",
      "topic": "可撤回憲政：系列收束",
      "iteration_type": "synthesis",
      "is_checkpoint": true,
      "canonical_url": "/p/lm-001871/",
      "raw_url": "/raw/lm-001871.md",
      "api_url": "/api/papers/lm-001871.json",
      "authorship": "collaborative",
      "month": "2026-07",
      "language": "zh-Hant"
    }
  ],
  "current_state": {
    "sequence": 7,
    "artifact_id": "lm-001871",
    "status": "completed",
    "phase_status": "closed_by_design",
    "declaration": "憲政的正當性不應來自制度的永久性，而應來自制度願意且能夠被試行、被挑戰、被日落、被重新授權——可撤回性本身就是合法性的來源之一。",
    "stop_reason": "終篇（第七篇）自身的系列總結章節依序回顧第一至七篇並收束於「可撤回憲政」機制，七篇構成一個從錨點形式化到可操作憲政機制的完整論證鏈，無待補篇號。",
    "unresolved_gaps": [],
    "next_actions": [],
    "handoff_required_tasks": [],
    "stewardship": "篇序取自第七篇（可撤回憲政）文中「第一篇：時間化憲法」至「第七篇：可撤回憲政」的明文系列回顧章節，逐篇核對標題與已發表文件一致，非推斷。全系列由 Neo.K 獨立署名，無 AI 協作者欄位——與同站其他多數系列不同，但為此系列一貫的既有慣例（第一至五篇沿用同一格式），非本次新增文件造成的不一致。",
    "artifact": {
      "sequence": 7,
      "id": "lm-001871",
      "title": "可撤回憲政_制度試行日落回復與持續再授權_v0.1",
      "topic": "可撤回憲政：系列收束",
      "iteration_type": "synthesis",
      "is_checkpoint": true,
      "canonical_url": "/p/lm-001871/",
      "raw_url": "/raw/lm-001871.md",
      "api_url": "/api/papers/lm-001871.json",
      "authorship": "collaborative",
      "month": "2026-07",
      "language": "zh-Hant"
    }
  },
  "integrity": {
    "files_seen": 7,
    "files_imported": 7,
    "missing_sequences": [],
    "missing_note": "",
    "duplicate_resolved": []
  },
  "generated_at": "2026-08-07T08:22:15Z"
}